Solar Installers Google Ads Benchmarks 2026
Verified CTR, CPC, conversion rate, and CPA for Residential solar panel installation and design-build on Google Ads — plus the diagnostic questions every Solar Installers account should be able to answer.
Solar Installers Search benchmarks
Updated May 7, 2026Numbered citations refer to the Sources block at the bottom of this page.
Pawel "Vilo" Wilk — Google Ads specialist, runs the Project UP performance team. PerfoAds is independent IP. Solar Installers numbers in this page are sourced from public industry reports and cross-referenced with audit patterns I see weekly.
PerfoAds Read: what these numbers actually mean for Solar Installers
Solar is one of the strangest paid-search verticals in 2026. CPC at $3.87 is shockingly low for a category where the average customer is worth $20K-$45K, but that headline number hides a brutal split: branded national-tilt queries ("sunrun cost," "tesla solar quote") sit at $1-$2 CPC, while non-branded high-intent queries ("solar installers near me with battery," "30 percent solar tax credit installer") regularly clear $8-$15. Most solar accounts I audit are getting their ad spend pulled toward the cheap branded clicks while the expensive — and far more profitable — non-branded local intent goes underfunded.
Conversion rate of 5.13% is solid for a category where "convert" usually means "submit a long-form quote request," not buy something on the spot. But solar conversion data is notoriously fuzzy: roughly 60% of inbound leads ghost before the in-home consultation, and only 15-25% of those who consult actually sign. Accounts that report a 5% Google Ads conversion rate without tracking lead-to-appointment and appointment-to-contract are flying blind. Smart bidding optimized to a Google Ads-only conversion event will pour budget into form-fillers who never pick up the phone, and starve the keywords that produce real installs.
CPL at $104 is the published benchmark, but in 2026 the real number is closer to $150-$280 for non-branded leads in active solar markets (CA, AZ, TX, FL, NJ). The gap is the difference between a tire-kicker form fill and a homeowner with a shaded roof and the financial profile to qualify for a 25-year loan. The single most leveraged change I make on solar accounts: split campaigns by intent — "cost / quote / pricing" queries into one campaign with aggressive bid + long form, and "how does solar work / is it worth it" into a research-mode campaign with a soft lead magnet. Mixing them lets smart bidding average down on the wrong KPI and quietly destroys ROI.
The Investment Tax Credit (ITC) is the single most under-used copy lever in this vertical. Most solar ads still lean on "free quote" or "save on energy bills" — language that washes over a homeowner who has heard it 50 times. "30% federal tax credit through 2032," "net metering 1:1 in [state]," or "$0-down with [bank] financing" pull dramatically better in CTR and conversion because they're concrete and time-bounded. The accounts that win solar paid search in 2026 treat ad copy like a financing salesperson would — specific dollar figures, specific deadlines, specific local programs — not like a generic energy-saver pitch.
Where does your Solar Installers account sit against these numbers?
Run a Perfoads audit and get your CTR, CPC, conversion rate and waste-spend gap mapped against the Solar Installers benchmark — $49/mo per account, cancel anytime.
If your CPA is below $104, here are the 3 likeliest causes
Out of every Solar Installers account I audit, three patterns are responsible for roughly 80% of below-benchmark performance. Walk through them in this order — fixing them in the wrong order wastes time.
Lead form is too long for the ad-click context
Solar lead forms routinely ask for monthly bill amount, roof type, homeownership status, credit consent, and 6-8 other fields before submission. That depth is right for a sales rep on a callback, but it kills paid-search CPL. Use a two-step funnel: a 3-field initial form (zip, monthly bill estimate, contact) on the ad-click landing page, then enrich on the callback. Two-step typically cuts CPL 30-50% without measurably hurting lead quality once the appointment-set rate is tracked.
No state-specific landing pages or ad copy
Solar economics are entirely state-driven — net metering rules, state rebates, utility-specific buy-back rates, and time-of-use rate plans differ wildly between CA, NJ, TX, and AZ. Generic ad copy and one national landing page tell a CA homeowner nothing about NEM 3.0 and a TX homeowner nothing about ERCOT-specific rates. State-level location-targeted campaigns with state-specific copy and LPs lift CTR 30-60% and conversion rate 20-40% in our audits.
You are not bidding on competitor brand terms
Solar prospects routinely compare 3-5 installers before signing. National brands (Sunrun, SunPower, Tesla, Momentum) get the bulk of branded search because they out-spend on top-of-funnel. Mid-funnel comparison queries ("sunrun vs local installer," "tesla solar reviews," "sunpower alternative") are where local installers can win — often at $2-$4 CPC, with 8-15% CTR if the ad copy explicitly frames the local advantage. This is Google's most permissible competitor-bidding territory and most local solar companies leave it uncovered.
Solar Installers negative keyword starter list
Add these as account-level negatives to immediately stop wasted spend on common Solar Installers intent collisions. This is a starter list — your account will need 60-150 more specific to your service area, brand competitors, and seasonal spikes. Search-term reports beat published lists every time.
See the exact Solar Installers waste in your account
Perfoads scans your search-term report against the Solar Installers negative-keyword library and surfaces every wasted-click pattern in 5 minutes. $49/mo per Google Ads account.
Search vs Display vs Local Services — by surface
Cross-surface comparison for Residential solar panel installation and design-build. Display CPCs look attractive until you compare conversion rates and CPA — most Solar Installers accounts that run Display campaigns are paying for impressions, not jobs.
| Surface | CTR | CPC | Conv. rate | CPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Search | 4.21% | $3.87 | 5.13% | $104.00 |
| Display | 0.55% | $0.78 | 0.41% | $190.00 |
| Performance Max | 2.40% | $1.95 | 3.20% | $135.00 |
Frequently asked
What is a good CTR for solar installer Google Ads?+
Non-brand search CTR of 3.5-5.5% is the public benchmark for solar — WordStream 2025 reports 4.21% as the category average. Below 2.5% on non-brand intent keywords typically means the ad copy is competing on generic "free quote" language instead of state-specific rebate, ITC, or net-metering hooks. Brand CTR (your own company name) should sit at 25-40%; below 20% indicates a national brand is bidding aggressively on your name.
Why is my solar CPL so much higher than the $104 benchmark?+
The $104 figure is a category-level number that blends very-low-intent research queries with high-intent quote requests. In active solar markets (California, Arizona, Texas, New Jersey, Florida) non-branded high-intent CPL frequently runs $150-$280. The drivers are competition density, NEM 3.0 changes (in CA), and consumer caution around long financing terms. Tightening keyword match types and pushing ad copy toward specific dollar incentives ($0-down, 30% ITC, state rebate) usually compresses CPL 25-40% within 60-90 days.
Should solar installers use Performance Max?+
Cautiously, and never as the only campaign type. PMax can be effective for retargeting prior site visitors and for capturing demand on broad solar interest signals, but it is opaque on which queries actually generate leads — a serious problem in a vertical where lead quality varies 5-10× between query types. Run PMax alongside a structured Search campaign with full search-term visibility, monitor PMax with a dedicated landing page, and exclude high-funnel research segments via audience signals.
How important is state targeting for a solar Google Ads account?+
Critical. Solar economics — payback period, net metering rules, available rebates, dominant utility buy-back rates — vary so much state-to-state that a single national campaign cannot serve any state well. Build campaigns at the state level (or DMA where you serve a multi-state market), with state-specific ad copy referencing the actual rebates and rules in play. CTR and CR consistently lift 30-50% on properly localized accounts versus generic-copy national campaigns.
Is Local Services Ads available for solar installers?+
Local Services Ads does not have a solar installer category as of mid-2026. The closest categories (electrician, roofer) sometimes capture solar-adjacent intent but are not a primary lead source for solar installation. For now, solar lead generation lives almost entirely in Search, PMax, and Display — with Search carrying the highest-quality leads when properly structured.
Sources
- WordStream / LocalIQ. Google Ads Industry Benchmarks 2025 — Industrial / Energy. https://www.wordstream.com/blog/2025-google-ads-benchmarks (retrieved May 7, 2026)
- LocalIQ. Search Advertising Benchmarks Q4 2025 — Home Improvement / Solar. https://localiq.com/blog/search-advertising-benchmarks/ (retrieved May 7, 2026)
- IRS / U.S. Department of Energy. Federal Solar Investment Tax Credit (ITC) — Residential. https://www.energy.gov/eere/solar/homeowners-guide-federal-tax-credit-solar-photovoltaics (retrieved May 7, 2026)
Audit your Solar Installers Google Ads account
Get your account scored against Solar Installers benchmarks, see exactly where spend is leaking, and walk away with a prioritized fix list. Read-only access. Runs in 5 minutes.
Start the audit — $49/mo per accountAdditional accounts $29/mo each (up to 10) · Cancel anytime · 30-day guarantee
Other industry benchmarks
Roofing Google Ads Benchmarks
Adjacent home-improvement vertical with similar high-ticket and seasonal patterns.
See benchmarksElectricians Google Ads Benchmarks
Licensed-trade vertical that overlaps on solar electrical work and panel upgrades.
See benchmarksHome Security Google Ads Benchmarks
High-ticket recurring-revenue home category with comparable lead-quality challenges.
See benchmarks