1Understanding Quality Score
Quality Score is Google's rating of the quality and relevance of your keywords, ads, and landing pages. It directly impacts your costs and ad positions.
What Quality Score Is
A 1-10 rating per keyword that reflects:
- How relevant your ad is to the search
- How likely your ad is to get clicked
- How useful your landing page is
Why Quality Score Matters
Impact on Ad Rank: Ad Rank = Bid x Quality Score (simplified)
Higher Quality Score = Better positions at lower cost
Cost impact:
- QS 10: Pay ~50% less than average
- QS 7: Pay average
- QS 5: Pay ~25% more than average
- QS 3: Pay ~100% more than average
The Three Components
- Expected CTR (Above/Below/Average)
- Ad Relevance (Above/Below/Average)
- Landing Page Experience (Above/Below/Average)
Each component is evaluated independently.
Important Nuances
Quality Score is:
- Calculated at auction time (more granular than reported)
- Based on exact match searches
- Historical but weighted toward recent
- Device-specific (calculated separately)
Quality Score is NOT:
- Updated in real-time in reports
- The actual score used in auctions
- Impacted by your bidding strategy
- A direct ranking factor (Ad Rank is)
2Component 1: Expected CTR
Expected CTR predicts how likely your ad will be clicked when shown for the keyword.
How It's Calculated
Google compares your historical CTR to:
- Other advertisers on the same keyword
- Account for position (position-normalized)
- Similar keywords and match types
Rating interpretation:
- Above Average: CTR better than most competitors
- Average: CTR similar to competitors
- Below Average: CTR worse than competitors
Why Expected CTR Might Be Low
Ad-related causes:
- Headlines don't include keyword
- Weak call-to-action
- Missing differentiators
- Generic messaging
Keyword-related causes:
- Keyword too broad
- Low commercial intent
- High competition keywords
- Mismatched intent
Structural causes:
- Too many keywords per ad group
- Ads not tailored to keyword themes
- Wrong ad showing for keyword
How to Improve Expected CTR
Quick wins:
- Include keyword in Headline 1
- Add strong CTA in headlines
- Highlight unique benefits
- Use numbers and specifics
Structural improvements:
- Create tighter ad groups (5-15 keywords)
- Write ads specific to each theme
- Use keyword insertion where appropriate
- Test multiple ad variations
Testing approach:
- Identify below-average keywords
- Create new ads specific to those keywords
- Run for 2+ weeks
- Measure CTR improvement
- Check if QS component improves
Expected CTR Benchmarks
| Industry | Good CTR | Great CTR |
|---|---|---|
| Ecommerce | 2-3% | 4%+ |
| B2B | 2-4% | 5%+ |
| Local Services | 4-6% | 8%+ |
| Legal | 2-3% | 4%+ |
Note: These are search CTRs; display is much lower.
3Component 2: Ad Relevance
Ad relevance measures how closely your ad matches the intent behind a search.
How It's Calculated
Google analyzes:
- Keyword presence in ad text
- Semantic relationship between ad and keyword
- Historical performance for similar queries
- Match between search intent and ad message
Rating interpretation:
- Above Average: Ad closely matches search intent
- Average: Reasonable match
- Below Average: Weak connection between keyword and ad
Why Ad Relevance Might Be Low
Common causes:
- Keyword not in ad text at all
- Ad group too broad (many unrelated keywords)
- Same ad used across different intents
- Template ads without customization
- Keyword intent mismatch with offer
Example of poor relevance: Keyword: "emergency plumber near me" Ad headline: "Quality Plumbing Services" (Missing: "emergency" and location signals)
Example of good relevance: Keyword: "emergency plumber near me" Ad headline: "24/7 Emergency Plumber - [City]" (Matches: urgency and location intent)
How to Improve Ad Relevance
Step 1: Audit ad group structure
- Each ad group should have one theme
- All keywords should work with the same ad
- If not, split into separate ad groups
Step 2: Keyword-to-ad matching
- Headline 1: Include primary keyword/theme
- Headline 2: Expand on value proposition
- Headline 3: CTA or differentiator
- Descriptions: Natural keyword inclusion
Step 3: Intent alignment
- Understand what searcher wants
- Match ad message to that intent
- Ensure landing page delivers on promise
Dynamic solutions:
- Keyword insertion for exact match
- Responsive ads with varied headlines
- Ad customizers for dynamic content
Ad Relevance Improvement Checklist
- Primary keyword appears in ad
- Ad addresses the search intent
- All keywords in ad group share theme
- Different ad variations tested
- Intent matches throughout (keyword → ad → LP)
Want to see how your account stacks up?
Get a complete Google Ads audit in under 3 minutes.
4Component 3: Landing Page Experience
Landing page experience measures how useful and relevant your landing page is to people who click your ad.
How It's Calculated
Google evaluates:
- Content relevance to search query
- Page load speed
- Mobile-friendliness
- Navigation and usability
- Transparency and trustworthiness
- Bounce rate/engagement signals
Rating interpretation:
- Above Average: Great user experience and relevance
- Average: Adequate experience
- Below Average: Poor experience or relevance issues
Why Landing Page Experience Might Be Low
Content issues:
- Content doesn't match ad promise
- Keywords not present on page
- Thin or duplicate content
- Poor content quality
Technical issues:
- Slow page load
- Not mobile-friendly
- Broken elements
- Intrusive interstitials
Trust issues:
- Missing contact information
- No privacy policy
- Unclear business information
- Suspicious elements
User experience issues:
- Confusing navigation
- Too many ads/popups
- Difficult to find information
- Poor readability
How to Improve Landing Page Experience
Content optimization:
- Include target keywords naturally
- Match headline to ad headline
- Deliver on ad promises
- Add comprehensive, useful content
Technical optimization:
- Improve Core Web Vitals
- Achieve <3 second load time
- Ensure mobile responsiveness
- Fix any broken elements
Trust signals:
- Add contact information
- Display security badges
- Include testimonials/reviews
- Show business credentials
User experience:
- Clear, prominent CTA
- Easy navigation
- Readable fonts and layout
- Minimal distractions
Landing Page Testing
Tools to use:
- PageSpeed Insights (speed)
- Mobile-Friendly Test (mobile)
- Lighthouse (comprehensive)
- heatmaps for UX insights
Checklist:
- Page loads in <3 seconds
- Mobile experience is excellent
- Content matches ad keywords
- CTA is clear and visible
- Trust signals are present
- Navigation is intuitive
5Diagnosing Quality Score Issues
Systematic diagnosis helps you fix the right problems.
Step 1: Pull Quality Score Data
Export from Google Ads:
- Keywords
- Quality Score
- Expected CTR (status)
- Ad Relevance (status)
- Landing Page Experience (status)
- Impressions (for prioritization)
Step 2: Segment and Prioritize
Priority matrix:
| QS | High Impressions | Low Impressions |
|---|---|---|
| 1-4 | Fix immediately | Consider pausing |
| 5-6 | Improve next | Monitor |
| 7-8 | Optimize | Low priority |
| 9-10 | Maintain | Maintain |
Focus on high-impression, low-QS keywords first.
Step 3: Identify Component Issues
For each problem keyword, check which component(s) are below average:
| Pattern | Likely Issue |
|---|---|
| CTR below only | Ad copy problem |
| Relevance below only | Ad group structure |
| LP below only | Landing page problem |
| All below | Fundamental mismatch |
| CTR + Relevance | Ad needs overhaul |
| Relevance + LP | Intent mismatch |
Step 4: Root Cause Analysis
For CTR issues, ask:
- Is the keyword in the ad?
- Does the ad stand out from competitors?
- Is there a compelling reason to click?
- Is the keyword intent matchable?
For Relevance issues, ask:
- How many keywords in this ad group?
- Do all keywords share the same intent?
- Does the ad directly address the keyword?
- Should this be split into separate ad groups?
For LP issues, ask:
- Does LP content match the keyword?
- How fast does the page load?
- Is the mobile experience good?
- Is the CTA clear?
Step 5: Document Findings
Create an action plan:
| Keyword | QS | Issue | Root Cause | Action | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [keyword] | 4 | CTR | Generic ad | New ad copy | High |
| [keyword] | 5 | LP | Slow load | Optimize images | High |
6Quality Score Improvement Strategies
Proven strategies to improve each Quality Score component.
Strategy 1: SKAG/STAG Structure
Single Keyword Ad Groups (SKAG) or Single Theme Ad Groups (STAG) ensure perfect relevance.
Implementation:
- One keyword theme per ad group
- 3-5 closely related keywords max
- Ads written specifically for that theme
- Dedicated landing page if possible
When to use:
- High-value keywords
- Keywords with low QS despite good LP
- Keywords where relevance is the issue
Strategy 2: Message Match Optimization
Ensure consistent messaging from keyword to conversion.
The chain: Search query → Ad headline → Landing page headline → CTA
Example: Query: "organic dog food delivery" Ad: "Organic Dog Food Delivered | Fresh & Natural | Free Shipping" LP headline: "Organic Dog Food Delivered to Your Door" CTA: "Start Your Delivery"
Strategy 3: Landing Page Segmentation
Different keywords → Different landing pages
Implementation:
- Identify keyword themes
- Create LP variations for each theme
- Match headline and content to keywords
- Track performance by LP
Strategy 4: Ad Testing Protocol
Continuous ad testing improves CTR over time.
Process:
- Run 3-4 ad variations per ad group
- Let run for 2-4 weeks
- Pause lowest CTR performers
- Create new variations
- Repeat
What to test:
- Headline variations
- CTA variations
- Benefit emphasis
- Offer variations
Strategy 5: Speed Optimization
Fast pages improve LP experience score.
Quick wins:
- Compress images
- Enable caching
- Minimize JavaScript
- Use CDN
- Reduce redirects
Target:
- <3 seconds load time
-
90 PageSpeed score
Strategy 6: Historical QS Building
New keywords start with no history. Build positive history:
- Start with exact match
- Bid for good positions initially
- Use proven ad copy
- Ensure great LP experience
- Expand to broader match once established
Want to see how your account stacks up?
Get a complete Google Ads audit in under 3 minutes.
7Quality Score Monitoring
Ongoing monitoring prevents QS degradation.
Weekly QS Check
| Metric | Action Trigger |
|---|---|
| Keywords QS < 5 | Investigate immediately |
| Average QS dropping | Diagnose cause |
| New keywords stuck at low QS | Review setup |
| High-value keywords < 7 | Prioritize improvement |
QS Tracking Dashboard
Track over time:
- Average QS (impression-weighted)
- QS distribution (% at each level)
- Component ratings summary
- Week-over-week changes
Monthly QS Audit
- Export full keyword report with QS data
- Calculate impression-weighted average
- Compare to prior month
- Identify movers (up and down)
- Document improvements made and results
Alerts to Set
Critical:
- High-impression keyword drops to QS 4 or below
- Average account QS drops >1 point
- New campaign keywords stuck at QS 1-3
Warning:
- Any keyword drops 2+ points
- LP experience goes to "below average"
- CTR drops significantly
QS Improvement Log
Document all changes:
| Date | Keyword | Change Made | QS Before | QS After | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/1 | [kw] | New ad copy | 4 | 6 | CTR improved |
| 1/15 | [kw] | Page speed fix | 5 | 7 | LP improved |
This log helps identify what works for your account.
Realistic Expectations
QS improvements take time:
- Changes take 1-2 weeks to reflect
- Google weights recent history more
- Some keywords may never reach 10
- Focus on high-value keywords first
Diminishing returns:
- Moving 3→5 is easier than 8→10
- Some industries have lower average QS
- Perfect QS isn't always possible or necessary
- Focus on ROI, not just QS
8Advanced Quality Score Tactics
Advanced techniques for stubborn QS issues.
Tactic 1: Fresh Start Approach
For keywords with persistent low QS despite fixes:
- Pause the low-QS keyword
- Create a new ad group
- Add the same keyword fresh
- Use optimized ads and LP
- Build new history
Why this works: Sometimes historical baggage is too heavy.
Tactic 2: Device-Specific Optimization
QS is calculated separately by device.
Check:
- Segment QS report by device
- Identify if mobile or desktop is dragging down overall
Fix:
- Optimize LP for the lagging device
- Consider device-specific campaigns
- Adjust bids by device performance
Tactic 3: Geographic QS Variation
QS can vary by location.
Approach:
- Check performance by location
- Identify if specific regions underperform
- Consider location-specific LPs
- Use local phone numbers/addresses
Tactic 4: Competitor Analysis
Your QS is relative to competitors.
Analyze:
- What are competitor ads emphasizing?
- What offers are they using?
- How do their LPs compare?
Improve:
- Differentiate your messaging
- Match or beat competitor offers
- Exceed LP quality standards
Tactic 5: Negative Keyword QS Protection
Irrelevant searches hurt CTR, which hurts QS.
Process:
- Regular search term review
- Aggressive negative keyword addition
- Block irrelevant traffic before it impacts CTR
- Monitor impression/click ratio
Tactic 6: Ad Extension Impact
Extensions can improve CTR, indirectly helping QS.
Ensure you have:
- Sitelinks (4+ active)
- Callouts (4+ active)
- Structured snippets
- Call extensions (if applicable)
- Location extensions (if applicable)
Extensions make ads larger and more clickable.
Tactic 7: Auction-Time Reality
Remember: Reported QS ≠ Auction-time QS
Google uses many real-time signals not in reported QS:
- User's location
- Time of day
- Device
- Previous search behavior
- Countless other factors
Implication: Focus on fundamentals (relevance, CTR, LP quality) rather than chasing the reported number.